User Reviews
All Reviews by magtuse13
-
- Jump To Page:
- [ 1 ]
Gears of War 2 - Xbox 360
- Posted: Jan, 08, 2009
- Score: 4/5.0
- Read comments: 0
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Amazing visuals | Poor storytelling |
| Awesome audio | Repetitive gameplay |
| Epic boss fights | Terrible multiplayer |
| Tight controls | |
| Innovative concepts |
so much for greatness.
i bought this game at gamestop fill with excitement and imagine the surprise that await me. after three short days of playing gears 2 i became unsatisfied. the story takes place three months after marcus and delta squad planted the lightmass bomb. now it start again. your objective? plant a lightmass bomb. Again. you i pretty sure that doing it again get pretty boring. and it is. but if it weren't for the fresh cool mission and some cool weapon. this game should then be rename gears 1.5. the graphics awesome everthing went from dull land to rainbow land( no homo) everything got fill with color even the armor look shinier. the audio is awesome 80% of the sound is all new. that great news. but then the online play. One word LAG. playing online is like playing in a lag feast with bunch of player with shotgun( same as gears 1 NO difference). for example when ever i go up to a guy and shoot him not only with not died he would turn around and kill just like that. i then figure out that the host advantage still exist and only the player with the host can kill you faster and better. another thing is that when the boomshield glitch. it bad enough for a person to have 95% protection with a shield but then somehow player find out that you can replace a tiny pistol into a big shotgun. what the fuck! next thing you know people find out that you can jump extra high with the boomshield. nice job epic guys. and the sticking grenade is a nice feature until epic decide to make smoking grenade of DEATH i throw and you be down faster then your grandma. then your useless charcter model drops dead and it takes 5-6 second to get up. by the time you get up you either get shot in the fucking face or chainsaw behind your ass. and who's idea to add an extra rocket for the boom shot? you guys are dumbasses.but in the end it still a great game with great graphics. like cliffy b says " and remember take cover"
Call of Duty: World at War - Xbox 360
- Posted: Dec, 03, 2008
- Score: 4/5.0
- Read comments: 1
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Amazing visuals | Doesn't live up to expectations |
| Awesome audio | Braindead computer AI |
| Intense action | |
| Tight controls |
a core gamer's viewpoint.
i know what you guys are thinking that it going to suck because is wasn't made by infinity ward? But you guys are wrong! cod world at war has some of the best graphics i have ever seen. but the shadow,and the texture could have been better. for instance when i look at the floor i can see it mudding and pixel looks and if you have notice some of the wall cover looks like crap! at least it better then call of duty 3.also i notice that for the xbox 360 version the graphics has once again won compare to ps3. but for call of duty 4 both version are identical amazing isn't it. for once i would like to see treyarch make the ps3 version ''better''. another problem is the AL. yeah they SUCK while i was playing story mode on veteran when i was hiding behind the cover. i saw SIX grenades pop right into my screen and guess what happen i died. but cod4 AL didn't throw massive grenades at you. another problem is that when i want my team mates to help me out to fight while i stay downlow. you would think that they will fight until they die. NO instead they stay with you. what the fuck am I your captain? i'm just pvt. miller and pvt. petrvesko. and to make them go i have to go forward and then go back to my safe hiding place. but the fight never ends! the enemy AL just keeps coming and coming they never stop! to stop them i have to run my ass toward them just to make them stop.And don't get me started with the checkpoint. one word retard.like gamepro said checkpoint is unbalance! when i am on the russian mission where you are suppose to destroy the flank guns (4 of them) i destroy one and guess what NO CHECKPOINT. i mean it already bad enough to try to beat it on veteran. but no you have to destroy of 4 of them to get a fucking checkpoint. and when i died a checkpoint then shows up. but there are a couple of nice features i like. the coop play is one of them. with three mode you can play with friends it a blast. it also fresh to see tanks in online play sure it almost like a huge advantage but it great for the team and for yourself. in the end i still like the game it fun and addicting the coop like i said was a blast and the story turn out to be better then what i have expected. but either way it should be rated a 4 out of 5. nothing compares to call of duty 4 modern warfare.
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare - PS3
- Posted: Sep, 17, 2008
- Score: 4/5.0
- Read comments: 0
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Amazing visuals | Poor storytelling |
| Intense action | |
| Addictive gameplay | |
| Tight controls | |
| Fantastic multiplayer |
almost perfect!
modern warfare has it ups and down but in the end it a great fps game with intense online play. to start off the story. for people who likes really intense story. this is not for you. sure the story it fast and the visual is really nice. but 8 hours!! that is just not enough for hardcore cod fans. the controls is really tight all you have to do is aim and shoot. it that easy!. the online play is the best online game ever. the level up system is fresh and awesome! the guns and attachment are creative and fun! the maps for cod4 are really nice.
Profile Overview
magtuse13's Popular Blog Posts
Most Recent User Reviews
-
- Gears of War 2
- [4]
i bought this game at gamestop fill with excitement and imagine the surprise that await me. after three short days of playing gears 2 i became unsa ...
-
- Call of Duty: World at War
- [4]
i know what you guys are thinking that it going to suck because is wasn't made by infinity ward? But you guys are wrong! cod world at war has some ...
