Demarius_b
Killswitch wrote:I feel like I'm the only one here that takes the time to get all the achievements, or go through extra playthroughs to get more achievements.You people suck.
I'm just a plain whore and spend my time having sex with as many women as possible. Much more satisfying than achievements...
xAluru
smroadkill15 wrote:Achievements are better cause EVERY game supports achievements, not every game supports trophies. To say trophies are better than achievements is just dumb because you wouldn't even have trophies if it wasn't for achievements.
To say Ninja Gaiden (Xbox) is better than DMC is just dumb because you wouldn't even have NG if it wasn't for DMC.
...See what I did there? And again, Micro$oft didn't have achievements first. Don't forget that, all of you.
Also, all PS3 games released in 2009 and beyond have trophy support.
KarlB
xAluru wrote:joe14636 wrote:
xAluru wrote:IMO there just better, you don't have to look at 4 different types of achievements like you do with trophies.
joe14636 wrote:Micro$oft didn't do achievements first. Many games had arbitrary awards before the first Xbox even released.Explain how they "excel" in it, if you don't mind.
xAluru wrote:By the way, NO LINKS FOR YOU.If there's is one thing that Microsoft did first it's achievements, and they definitely excel in it.
That's it? Looking at three different kinds of trophies (aside from the one platinum) makes it worse?How do you easily differentiate the easy and challenging achievements? You have to look at all the various point values, ranging from 5-50 typically in increments of 5, then you're required to make your own determination on the challenge level for each one. With trophies when you skim through the trophy list for a game, you look for three different colors. It's that simple.
Try not to use broken logic next time...
It know it hard to get. Is read the descripions of the achievements. Some I thought I know I wouldn't got and got it. But that really stupit easy if you go thought some loop hole. Like in SVR2010. There a achievement where you must defend your title belit on legend. You just have set it 10 or 20 min. And then pin the only opininite durring the time period that just you and him or her. And then when other come put. Play caowerd most of the match. And then when the match is over. You will unlocked it. But there is some that are soul crushing achievements. But they are tend to be games made my japan developers. Trust me on this. There is soul crushing achievements out there. It just finding that game that has it.
KarlB
xAluru wrote:smroadkill15 wrote:Achievements are better cause EVERY game supports achievements, not every game supports trophies. To say trophies are better than achievements is just dumb because you wouldn't even have trophies if it wasn't for achievements.
To say Ninja Gaiden (Xbox) is better than DMC is just dumb because you wouldn't even have NG if it wasn't for DMC....See what I did there? And again, Micro$oft didn't have achievements first. Don't forget that, all of you.
Also, all PS3 games released in 2009 and beyond have trophy support.
Dude NG was made even befoer DMC. The oringal one was made for NES. But the gameplay the modren version of the game is true. And the oringal NG was in 2D and not in 3D.
diablo2lod
i go for all the ones i deem to be reasonable... such as collecting all of a certain hidden object... but like in masseffect when they want you to use certain useless spells over and over again, i say fuck tht shit... specially if you have to kill enemies with tht move... i also ignore online only ones... i have xbl, but i dont feel like playing so many games of gears that i get 500,000 kills...
KarlB
xAluru wrote:smroadkill15 wrote:Achievements are better cause EVERY game supports achievements, not every game supports trophies. To say trophies are better than achievements is just dumb because you wouldn't even have trophies if it wasn't for achievements.
To say Ninja Gaiden (Xbox) is better than DMC is just dumb because you wouldn't even have NG if it wasn't for DMC....See what I did there? And again, Micro$oft didn't have achievements first. Don't forget that, all of you.
Also, all PS3 games released in 2009 and beyond have trophy support.
But it was first interrated achievement system in a hardwear devices.
fatface
I'm kinda of an achievement whore. It's a nice feature and I commend all those with high gamerscores (I wanna get at least 10,000 by March lol). But I really just play my games for fun and don't care if I get certain achievements or not.
As far trophies being better than achievements, it's really more of a personal matter in my opinion. Each of them have benefits but really provide the same satisfaction. It doesn't make you more of a gamer if you got a platinum over someone who got every achievement. Both of you guys and gals are still the same lmao :p
Train_of_Thought
smroadkill15 wrote:Achievements are better cause EVERY game supports achievements, not every game supports trophies. To say trophies are better than achievements is just dumb because you wouldn't even have trophies if it wasn't for achievements.
that's the thing, EVERY 360 game has them, that doesn't make them better, like at all. you can go rent a hundred shitty games for the 360, get only 100 points per game, and you'll boost your score to 10000 with ease. Trophies aren't in every game, but it makes it far more "needy" because you have to play games that you wouldn't want to play that contain them, where as, you can play any 360 game you like, and you know you'll get achievements.
xAluru
KarlB wrote:xAluru wrote:smroadkill15 wrote:Achievements are better cause EVERY game supports achievements, not every game supports trophies. To say trophies are better than achievements is just dumb because you wouldn't even have trophies if it wasn't for achievements.
To say Ninja Gaiden (Xbox) is better than DMC is just dumb because you wouldn't even have NG if it wasn't for DMC....See what I did there? And again, Micro$oft didn't have achievements first. Don't forget that, all of you.
Also, all PS3 games released in 2009 and beyond have trophy support.
Dude NG was made even befoer DMC. The oringal one was made for NES. But the gameplay the modren version of the game is true. And the oringal NG was in 2D and not in 3D.
Your first post was moot, so I'm not even going to respond to it.
I inserted "(Xbox)" for a reason. I'm fully aware the franchise is older.
xAluru
KarlB wrote:xAluru wrote:smroadkill15 wrote:Achievements are better cause EVERY game supports achievements, not every game supports trophies. To say trophies are better than achievements is just dumb because you wouldn't even have trophies if it wasn't for achievements.
To say Ninja Gaiden (Xbox) is better than DMC is just dumb because you wouldn't even have NG if it wasn't for DMC....See what I did there? And again, Micro$oft didn't have achievements first. Don't forget that, all of you.
Also, all PS3 games released in 2009 and beyond have trophy support.
But it was first interrated achievement system in a hardwear devices.
Micro$oft just took the arbitrary award system found in certain games and made the system be applied to gamer profiles, instead of game saves not viewable to everyone who can't visit the gamer who earned them.
