Forums
- Microsoft »
- halo.vs.bioshock.vs.gears of war
-
slinger420
- Gamer
Halo 3 for Multiplayer
and Gears is just crap
-
GuitarHero9
- Lurker
Giant Clank wrote:Killswitch90 wrote:Bioshock for single playerNO! BAD DOG!Halo 3 for Multiplayer
and Gears is just crap
I know the truth hurts. But you have to accept it
Killswitch90 wrote:Bioshock for single playerWhat he said. The only Thing I don't fully agree with is Gears being crap. It isn't, I just personally hate it. Camera hates me, then the game can go to hell.Halo 3 for Multiplayer
and Gears is just crap
-
slinger420
- Gamer
-
Daywalker2K3
- Gamer
Daywalker2K3 wrote:Killswitch90 wrote:Bioshock for single playerHalo 3 for Multiplayer
and Gears is just crap
Agreed.
disagreed, gears was a great game and despite a 94 or so on metacritic, a lot of people have some misplaced animosity towards it, the singleplayer consistently challenged on the harder difficulties, and perfected a lot of things other games had done well, but not THAT well, such as the cover system, some badass weapons, and the best co-op any game has to offer.. which trickles down to little innovations like the active reload feature (sure to be copied in other games in the near future) and an actual warfare feel in which not taking proper cover WILL lead to death.. not to mention (to me) its still the best looking game around, the only real fault with this game was a lack of plot.. which will get to be adressed in the 2nd
